![kerosun monitor 30 programming kerosun monitor 30 programming](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/arh3s4Umkcg/maxresdefault.jpg)
Let me be perfectly clear on this matter: more is more. I'm not sure what Patrick was expecting here. The tasks that can be improved are not the bottleneck to programmer productivity. On the other hand, I think it's clear that most programmers are not going to be 50% more productive over the course of a day just by getting a second monitor. Patrick, despite his skepticism – and remember, this is a guy who didn't see a productivity difference between a 14 inch laptop display and a "big ass LCD" – came away convinced: After looking at the studies, I think it's fair to say that some tasks can be made significantly faster if you have more screen real estate. The 30-inch Apple Cinema HD Display Productivity Benchmark (pdf).Toward Characterizing the Productivity Benefits of Very Large Displays (pdf).A Comparison of Single and Dual Traditional Aspect Displays with a Widescreen Display over Productivity (pdf).I'll combine his finds with mine to provide a one-stop-shop for research data supporting the idea that, yes, having more display space would in fact make you more productive: Patrick Dubroy took a skeptical look at the multiple monitor productivity claims and found several credible sources of data. That finding isn't exactly going to endear them to display vendors. This is something I personally experienced, and I dubbed it the The Large Display Paradox. But bear in mind they did find diminishing productivity returns with 26 inch displays. I agree it's a little sketchy to cite a study from a display vendor that advocates- surprise- buying more and bigger displays. It's very similar to the multiple monitor survey they conducted in 2003, also under the auspices of NEC. This isn't the first time the University of Utah has conducted a multiple monitor study. I dug around a bit and found the actual study results (pdf) or something very close to it, if you're looking for more detail than the summary I've presented above. Productivity dropped off again when people used a 26-inch screen.People who used the two 20-inch monitors were 44% faster than those with the 18-inch ones.People using the 24-inch screen completed the tasks 52% faster than people who used the 18-inch monitor.So I was naturally intrigued when I read about a new multiple monitor study from the University of Utah: Researchers at the University of Utah tested how quickly people performed tasks like editing a document and copying numbers between spreadsheets while using three different computer configurations: I'm always looking for ammunition for fellow developers to claim those second (and maybe even third) monitors that are rightfully theirs under the Programmer's Bill of Rights. I have three monitors at home and at work. Joining the Prestigious Three Monitor Club.I've written about the manifold joys of many-monitor computing a number of times over the last four years:
#KEROSUN MONITOR 30 PROGRAMMING WINDOWS#
I've been a multiple monitor enthusiast since the dark days of Windows Millennium Edition. Visit this page to learn about the Fibonacci sequence.Does More Than One Monitor Improve Productivity? The first two terms of the Fibonacci sequence are 0 followed by 1. The Fibonacci sequence is a sequence where the next term is the sum of the previous two terms.